God (gets lonely) too.

Advertisements

Is there a better way for us to work together?

At its heart, Quaker Meeting is an organization in which everyone assumes a portion of the work of sustaining the whole.

For Friends, that’s evolved into what we know as committees, and the system can be beautiful when everything’s running smoothly. The reality, however, sees serious gaps in its operation. (That’s not to say that some committees aren’t doing their jobs, much less doing them well.)

Still, for starters, not everyone accepts an appointment to serve on a committee, especially when it means a commitment to a year (or three) of face-to-face meetings each month. Extenuating circumstances, ranging from work hours and conflicting demands on our time to health issues or, for many, aging itself, are cited. As a result, despite the efforts of Nominating, some committees lack enough workers to carry the load, even if everybody shows up. Or the burden falls on a single Friend or two, which leads to burnout, while others do nothing.

Add to that the need for leadership in each committee – especially a clerk who will assume responsibility for conducting meetings monthly and seeing that Friends do what they’ve promised. When you have as many committees as we do, the list grows short

There’s also an expectation that everyone will attend the Monthly Meeting for Worship for the Conduct of Business, which typically has 15 to 20 present rather than the 50 to 60 in the room just an hour earlier.

The ideal and reality differ.

I’ve long wondered if there might be a better way to get the work of the Meeting accomplished – something more flexible, efficient, and inclusive. More recently, observing how we function, I’ve seen what often happens is that a single individual takes up a concern and runs with it. Sometimes it’s ongoing, like the Light List, newsletter, or Meeting contact list. Other times, it’s a matter of heading up a one-time activity and rallying others to the cause. Think of our recent wedding, the Apple Harvest Day booth, or leaf-raking. Can this point us to alternative structures?

While hearing the caution that the work won’t magically disappear and that

reorganization can be nothing more than shuffling the chairs on the Titanic, I also recognize the importance of getting all the oars in the lifeboat rowing in harmony – away from the ship rather than in circles – something that means getting the right people sitting in the right places.

Over the past few months, after revisiting concerns raised in threshing sessions and our annual State of the Meeting reports, our Ministry and Worship committee has been inviting dialogue to consider a new paradigm of Quaker service within the community. Wherever it leads, the conversations are raising some fresh possibilities for our working together.

We’re not alone here, either. Worcester Friends recently restructured to three committees – Ministry and Teaching, Practical, and Peace and Social Concerns – which meet one Sunday a month before worship, as does their monthly business meeting. And Fresh Pond laid down all of its committees for a year before restructuring.

We have an opportunity to be innovative and bold. Whatever we come up with will attract widespread attention across the Quaker spectrum. Where might the Spirit lead us?

~*~

This originally appeared in Dover Friends Meeting’s newsletter as we consider new ways of addressing the needs of our faith community. Unlike many denominations, we Quakers are closely involved in the business of our congregations, or “meetings,” given that name by our recognition of church as the believers or people rather than any organization or building. (And so, the church meets.) The “monthly meeting,” or local congregation, is so named because we gather together to review our common business once a month even though we worship together at least once a week.

In sharing this dialogue, I’m hoping Friends and non-Quakers will perceive ways the discussion might benefit their own circles, religious or otherwise. I certainly welcome insights and suggestions. After all, we’re all in a time of upheaval and the challenges are many. Once again, the world’s being turned upside down.

Welcoming the Light

The early Quaker understanding was quite different from the “Inner Light” concept voiced by modern Friends. Just listen to Elizabeth Bathurst (1655?-1685):

  • For this Principle of Light, of which I now write, ’tis something of the Nature and Being of God himself, who as he is a Spirit, so he is Light, as you may read concerning him, and therefore it is by his Light, with which we are enlightned: It proceedeth from him, he being the Ocean wherein the Fulness thereof is contained; ’tis from him, through his Son Christ Jesus, that we come to be enlightned by the same: So ’tis in his Light that we see Light, even as the natural Sun causeth its Beams to extend to the Ends of the Earth; so this eternal Sun of Righteousness, who is the Ocean and Fountain of Divine Spiritual Light, causeth more or less of the Streams thereof to descend into all immortal Souls upon it.
  • But if People will shut their Eyes against the Light, how just is it for the Lord to withdraw its Shinings from them, and to cause Darkness to overtake them?
  • For though a Measure of this Divine Light, is, or hath been in every Man, in order to save them, yet it will not always abide with them, (I mean, as to its saving Efficacy) it will continue no longer than during the Day of their Visitation: Therefore saith Christ, Yet a little While is the Light with you; walk while ye have the Light, lest Darkness come upon you.
  • But if Men pass this Time over without any Regard to the Loving-Kindness of the Lord extended to them in this Matter, ’tis just with him to turn their Light into Darkness in them; and then, as Christ said to some of old, If the Light that is in you be Darkness, how great is that Darkness.
  • Mistake me not, ’tis not to be understood as if the Sun of Righteousness, which is the Fountain of Light, could in itself possibly become Darkness, but as to those that have fast-closed their Eyes, or lost the true Sight, lest they should see by its Illumination in their inward Man; when once their Day is over, they may be as dark as if there were no Sun in their Horizon, and so they put Darkness for Light.